Writing in the Visual Age Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Writing in the Visual Age - Research Paper ExampleWhile some emphasize the need to essentially teach rhetorical analysis of images to the students of a penning class, others advocate the importance of aural or textual messages by claiming that no matter how skillfully designed, pictures or images should not be considered to be more capable both emotionally and informatively in comparison to words. Those favoring the newly introduced development of ocular rhetoric filtrate on the importance of photographs and deem them as elements significantly capable of providing more obvious evidence to the public. This paper is basically an attempt to explain why opthalmic rhetoric should be taught as part of a writing class while similarly acknowledging the opposing ideas put forward by critics weighing the believability of opthalmic rhetoric in a writing class. This paper will also include some suggestions about how effective actions could be made to get up the position and validity of v isual rhetoric in context of composition studies. This is important because though some people might be able to make up change on some levels, it again leaves legion(predicate) educationists and teachers to deal with depressing frustration when visual communication fails to stick for long.I... isually demonstrate how Europe brought the light of literacy and military man to the dark land of Congo, she filled the star in the flag with very meaningful images of slavery and explorers and the blue field around it with several though-provoking and informative images of senile African art. Such useful incorporation of visual rhetoric not only must have delivered more inspirational, interesting, informative, and emotional lesson to the class but it also must have made the whole class remember the logic behind the flags design for a longer period. This is understandable as in contrast to a teacher who likes to simply stand behind the rostrum sticking to very conventional and orthodox tea ching strategies is certainly much(prenominal) less likely to convey a deeper understanding of a subject to his/her students than a teacher who prefers to institute change and benefit from strategies like using visual rhetoric to demonstrate the meaning and logic behind a concept. Majority of the researchers at the Wharton School of Business concluded after comparing verbal presentations to visual presentations that presenters who combined visual and verbal components were more persuasive (MacroVU, Inc.). Students are much more likely to reason with a complex dilemma which might be puzzling them when teachers feel motivated to visually explain the confusing parts which is why visual rhetoric should be taught as part of a writing class. It is claimed by Williams in support of the visual mode of communication that this mode literally challenges the people to both see and perceive an image in many different new ways unlike verbal or textual messages (18). Visual communication is the n ame of a very reasonable and self-evident scheme which should not be underestimated. The research stresses that